Sempron 3850 vs Opteron X2170

VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron X2170
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.23
+66.2%
Sempron 3850
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
0.74

Opteron X2170 outperforms Sempron 3850 by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron X2170 and Sempron 3850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23322680
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency4.572.75
Architecture codenameSteppe Eagle (2016)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date1 September 2016 (8 years ago)9 April 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Opteron X2170 and Sempron 3850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache2 MB (shared)2048 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Opteron X2170 and Sempron 3850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3AM1
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron X2170 and Sempron 3850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+FMA4
AVX++
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron X2170 and Sempron 3850 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron X2170 and Sempron 3850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1600
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon R5EAMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Number of pipelinesno data128
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Opteron X2170 and Sempron 3850 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Opteron X2170 and Sempron 3850 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron X2170 and Sempron 3850.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron X2170 1.23
+66.2%
Sempron 3850 0.74

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron X2170 1911
+66.2%
Sempron 3850 1150

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.23 0.74
Recency 1 September 2016 9 April 2014

Opteron X2170 has a 66.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

The Opteron X2170 is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 3850 in performance tests.

Be aware that Opteron X2170 is a server/workstation processor while Sempron 3850 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron X2170 and Sempron 3850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron X2170
Opteron X2170
AMD Sempron 3850
Sempron 3850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron X2170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate Sempron 3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron X2170 or Sempron 3850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.