Xeon 6979P vs Opteron X2 880

VS

Primary details

Comparing Opteron X2 880 and Xeon 6979P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameEgypt (2005−2006)Granite Rapids (2024)
Release dateSeptember 2005 (19 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Opteron X2 880 and Xeon 6979P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)120
Threads2240
Base clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache128 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB504 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm5 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistors233 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Opteron X2 880 and Xeon 6979P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
Socket9407529
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt500 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron X2 880 and Xeon 6979P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Opteron X2 880 and Xeon 6979P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron X2 880 and Xeon 6979P are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron X2 880 and Xeon 6979P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron X2 880 and Xeon 6979P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data96

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 120
Threads 2 240
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 500 Watt

Opteron X2 880 has 426.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6979P, on the other hand, has 5900% more physical cores and 11900% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Opteron X2 880 and Xeon 6979P. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron X2 880 and Xeon 6979P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron X2 880
Opteron X2 880
Intel Xeon 6979P
Xeon 6979P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron X2 880 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon 6979P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron X2 880 or Xeon 6979P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.