EPYC 7402P vs Opteron X2 880
Primary details
Comparing Opteron X2 880 and EPYC 7402P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 171 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 13.43 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 14.58 |
| Architecture codename | Egypt (2005−2006) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| Release date | September 2005 (19 years ago) | 7 August 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,250 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Opteron X2 880 and EPYC 7402P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 28 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 192 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 233 million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron X2 880 and EPYC 7402P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | 940 | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 180 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron X2 880 and EPYC 7402P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron X2 880 and EPYC 7402P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron X2 880 and EPYC 7402P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.763 GB/s |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 24 |
| Threads | 2 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 180 Watt |
Opteron X2 880 has 89.5% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7402P, on the other hand, has 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Opteron X2 880 and EPYC 7402P. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron X2 880 and EPYC 7402P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
