EPYC 7402P vs Opteron X2 880

VS

Primary details

Comparing Opteron X2 880 and EPYC 7402P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated171
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data14.04
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data14.61
Architecture codenameEgypt (2005−2006)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release dateSeptember 2005 (19 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,250

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Opteron X2 880 and EPYC 7402P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speedno data2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.35 GHz
Multiplierno data28
L1 cache128 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Number of transistors233 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Opteron X2 880 and EPYC 7402P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
Socket940TR4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron X2 880 and EPYC 7402P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron X2 880 and EPYC 7402P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron X2 880 and EPYC 7402P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 48
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 180 Watt

Opteron X2 880 has 89.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7402P, on the other hand, has 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Opteron X2 880 and EPYC 7402P. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron X2 880 and EPYC 7402P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron X2 880
Opteron X2 880
AMD EPYC 7402P
EPYC 7402P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron X2 880 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 6 votes

Rate EPYC 7402P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron X2 880 or EPYC 7402P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.