Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 vs Opteron X2 290
Primary details
Comparing Opteron X2 290 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
| Architecture codename | Italy (2005−2006) | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) |
| Release date | 1 January 2006 (18 years ago) | 4 June 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Opteron X2 290 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 36 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 3 nm |
| Number of transistors | 233 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron X2 290 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | 940 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron X2 290 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XDNA 2 NPU |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron X2 290 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron X2 290 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2006 | 4 June 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 12 |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 55 Watt |
Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 has an age advantage of 18 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, a 2900% more advanced lithography process, and 72.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Opteron X2 290 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Opteron X2 290 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron X2 290 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
