Xeon Phi 7230 vs Opteron X2 185

Primary details

Comparing Opteron X2 185 and Xeon Phi 7230 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameDenmark (2005−2006)Knights Landing (2016)
Release date6 March 2006 (18 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$435no data

Detailed specifications

Opteron X2 185 and Xeon Phi 7230 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2256
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB32 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm
Die size199 mm2no data
Number of transistors233 million8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Opteron X2 185 and Xeon Phi 7230 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket9393647
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt215 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron X2 185 and Xeon Phi 7230. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

Opteron X2 185 and Xeon Phi 7230 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron X2 185 and Xeon Phi 7230 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron X2 185 and Xeon Phi 7230. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 March 2006 20 June 2016
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 256
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 215 Watt

Opteron X2 185 has 95.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon Phi 7230, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 3100% more physical cores and 12700% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Opteron X2 185 and Xeon Phi 7230. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron X2 185 and Xeon Phi 7230, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron X2 185
Opteron X2 185
Intel Xeon Phi 7230
Xeon Phi 7230

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Opteron X2 185 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Phi 7230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron X2 185 or Xeon Phi 7230, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.