Xeon Gold 6162 vs Opteron X2 175
Primary details
Comparing Opteron X2 175 and Xeon Gold 6162 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Architecture codename | Denmark (2005−2006) | no data |
| Release date | 2 August 2005 (19 years ago) | 1 July 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $530 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Opteron X2 175 and Xeon Gold 6162 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 33 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 199 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 233 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron X2 175 and Xeon Gold 6162 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | 939 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron X2 175 and Xeon Gold 6162. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
Security technologies
Opteron X2 175 and Xeon Gold 6162 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron X2 175 and Xeon Gold 6162 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron X2 175 and Xeon Gold 6162. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR4-2400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 768 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron X2 175 and Xeon Gold 6162.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 August 2005 | 1 July 2018 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 24 |
| Threads | 2 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 150 Watt |
Opteron X2 175 has 36.4% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6162, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Opteron X2 175 and Xeon Gold 6162. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron X2 175 and Xeon Gold 6162, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
