Xeon Gold 6161 vs Opteron X2 170
Primary details
Comparing Opteron X2 170 and Xeon Gold 6161 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon Gold |
| Architecture codename | Denmark (2005−2006) | Skylake (server) (2017−2019) |
| Release date | 2 August 2005 (19 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $475 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Opteron X2 170 and Xeon Gold 6161 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 22 (Docosa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 44 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 22 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 1.375 MB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 22 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 30.25 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 199 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 233 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron X2 170 and Xeon Gold 6161 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 4 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | 939 | Socket P |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 165 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron X2 170 and Xeon Gold 6161. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron X2 170 and Xeon Gold 6161 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron X2 170 and Xeon Gold 6161. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 128.001 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 22 |
| Threads | 2 | 44 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 165 Watt |
Opteron X2 170 has 50% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6161, on the other hand, has 1000% more physical cores and 2100% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Opteron X2 170 and Xeon Gold 6161. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron X2 170 and Xeon Gold 6161, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
