Apple M1 vs Opteron X2 165
Primary details
Comparing Opteron X2 165 and Apple M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1190 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Apple Apple M-Series |
| Architecture codename | Denmark (2005−2006) | no data |
| Release date | 2 August 2005 (19 years ago) | 10 November 2020 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $417 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Opteron X2 165 and Apple M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.064 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 2 MB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 199 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 233 million | 16000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron X2 165 and Apple M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | 939 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron X2 165 and Apple M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Apple M1 8-Core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 August 2005 | 10 November 2020 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
Apple M1 has an age advantage of 15 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Opteron X2 165 and Apple M1. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Opteron X2 165 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron X2 165 and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
