Xeon Gold 6354 vs Opteron 840 EE
Primary details
Comparing Opteron 840 EE and Xeon Gold 6354 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 186 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 12.04 |
| Architecture codename | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| Release date | May 2004 (20 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Opteron 840 EE and Xeon Gold 6354 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 18 (Octadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 36 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 39 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 77 °C |
| Number of transistors | 106 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 840 EE and Xeon Gold 6354 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | 940 | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 840 EE and Xeon Gold 6354. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Opteron 840 EE and Xeon Gold 6354 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 840 EE and Xeon Gold 6354 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 840 EE and Xeon Gold 6354. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 840 EE and Xeon Gold 6354.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 18 |
| Threads | 1 | 36 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 205 Watt |
Opteron 840 EE has 583.3% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6354, on the other hand, has 1700% more physical cores and 3500% more threads, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Opteron 840 EE and Xeon Gold 6354. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 840 EE and Xeon Gold 6354, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
