Ultra 7 256V vs Opteron 8212 HE (F2)
Primary details
Comparing Opteron 8212 HE (F2) and Core Ultra 7 256V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 631 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | no data | 67.69 |
| Architecture codename | Santa Rosa (2006−2007) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
| Release date | 15 August 2006 (18 years ago) | 24 September 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,019 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Opteron 8212 HE (F2) and Core Ultra 7 256V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 37 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 235 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 227 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 8212 HE (F2) and Core Ultra 7 256V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 8 | 1 |
| Socket | F | Intel BGA 2833 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 68 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 8212 HE (F2) and Core Ultra 7 256V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Opteron 8212 HE (F2) and Core Ultra 7 256V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 8212 HE (F2) and Core Ultra 7 256V are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 8212 HE (F2) and Core Ultra 7 256V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Arc 140V |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 8212 HE (F2) and Core Ultra 7 256V.
| PCIe version | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 15 August 2006 | 24 September 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 68 Watt | 17 Watt |
Ultra 7 256V has an age advantage of 18 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 2900% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Opteron 8212 HE (F2) and Core Ultra 7 256V. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Opteron 8212 HE (F2) is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 256V is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 8212 HE (F2) and Core Ultra 7 256V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
