Xeon E-2134 vs Opteron 6386 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6386 SE
2012
16 cores / 16 threads, 140 Watt
5.22
Xeon E-2134
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 71 Watt
5.83
+11.7%

Xeon E-2134 outperforms Opteron 6386 SE by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6386 SE and Xeon E-2134 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11971126
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.4717.37
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon E
Power efficiency3.537.77
Architecture codenameAbu Dhabi (2012)Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019)
Release date5 November 2012 (12 years ago)12 July 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,408$256

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E-2134 has 3596% better value for money than Opteron 6386 SE.

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6386 SE and Xeon E-2134 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache768 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (per die)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size315 mm2126 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors2,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6386 SE and Xeon E-2134 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41 (Uniprocessor)
SocketG34FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt71 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6386 SE and Xeon E-2134. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

Opteron 6386 SE and Xeon E-2134 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6386 SE and Xeon E-2134 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6386 SE and Xeon E-2134. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics P630

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6386 SE and Xeon E-2134.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 6386 SE 5.22
Xeon E-2134 5.83
+11.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron 6386 SE 8291
Xeon E-2134 9260
+11.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.22 5.83
Recency 5 November 2012 12 July 2018
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 71 Watt

Opteron 6386 SE has 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Xeon E-2134, on the other hand, has a 11.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 97.2% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E-2134 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 6386 SE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6386 SE and Xeon E-2134, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6386 SE
Opteron 6386 SE
Intel Xeon E-2134
Xeon E-2134

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 10 votes

Rate Opteron 6386 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 9 votes

Rate Xeon E-2134 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6386 SE or Xeon E-2134, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.