i7-12700KF vs Opteron 6378

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6378
2012
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
3.85
Core i7-12700KF
2021
12 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
22.43
+483%

Core i7-12700KF outperforms Opteron 6378 by a whopping 483% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6378 and Core i7-12700KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1475240
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.3344.43
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i7
Power efficiency3.0516.36
Architecture codenameAbu Dhabi (2012)Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021)
Release date5 November 2012 (11 years ago)27 October 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$396$384

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-12700KF has 3241% better value for money than Opteron 6378.

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6378 and Core i7-12700KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1620
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 4.0
Bus rateno data8 × 16 GT/s
Multiplierno data36
L1 cache768 KB384 KB
L2 cache16 MB2 MB
L3 cache8 MB (per die)1 MB
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size315 mm2215.25 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors2,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6378 and Core i7-12700KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketG34FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6378 and Core i7-12700KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Opteron 6378 and Core i7-12700KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6378 and Core i7-12700KF are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6378 and Core i7-12700KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.805 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6378 and Core i7-12700KF.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 6378 3.85
i7-12700KF 22.43
+483%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron 6378 5889
i7-12700KF 34331
+483%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.85 22.43
Recency 5 November 2012 27 October 2021
Physical cores 16 12
Threads 16 20
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 125 Watt

Opteron 6378 has 33.3% more physical cores, and 8.7% lower power consumption.

i7-12700KF, on the other hand, has a 482.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and 25% more threads.

The Core i7-12700KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 6378 in performance tests.

Be aware that Opteron 6378 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-12700KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6378 and Core i7-12700KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6378
Opteron 6378
Intel Core i7-12700KF
Core i7-12700KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate Opteron 6378 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1121 vote

Rate Core i7-12700KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6378 or Core i7-12700KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.