Ryzen 3 3300X vs Opteron 6274

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6274
2011
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
3.55
Ryzen 3 3300X
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
8.45
+138%

Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Opteron 6274 by a whopping 138% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6274 and Ryzen 3 3300X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1515894
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.5230.64
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.9212.30
Architecture codenameInterlagos (2011−2012)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release date14 November 2011 (13 years ago)24 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$909$120

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 3300X has 5792% better value for money than Opteron 6274.

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6274 and Ryzen 3 3300X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache768 KB (shared)96K (per core)
L2 cache8.00391 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size316 mm274 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors2,400 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6274 and Ryzen 3 3300X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketG34AM4
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6274 and Ryzen 3 3300X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6274 and Ryzen 3 3300X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6274 and Ryzen 3 3300X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6274 and Ryzen 3 3300X.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 6274 3.55
Ryzen 3 3300X 8.45
+138%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron 6274 5643
Ryzen 3 3300X 13425
+138%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.55 8.45
Recency 14 November 2011 24 April 2020
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 65 Watt

Opteron 6274 has 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 3 3300X, on the other hand, has a 138% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 76.9% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 3300X is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 6274 in performance tests.

Be aware that Opteron 6274 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 3300X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6274 and Ryzen 3 3300X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6274
Opteron 6274
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
Ryzen 3 3300X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Opteron 6274 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 1060 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6274 or Ryzen 3 3300X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.