EPYC 9654P vs Opteron 6274

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6274
2011
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
3.65
EPYC 9654P
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
73.67
+1918%

EPYC 9654P outperforms Opteron 6274 by a whopping 1918% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6274 and EPYC 9654P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking14305
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.916.98
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameInterlagos (2011−2012)Genoa
Release date14 November 2011 (12 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$909$10,625
Current price$362 (0.4x MSRP)$5987 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9654P has 667% better value for money than Opteron 6274.

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6274 and EPYC 9654P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)96
Threads16192
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache768 KB (shared)64K (per core)
L2 cache8.00391 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size316 mm212x 72 mm2
Number of transistors2,400 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6274 and EPYC 9654P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketG34SP5
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6274 and EPYC 9654P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6274 and EPYC 9654P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6274 and EPYC 9654P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6274 and EPYC 9654P.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 6274 3.65
EPYC 9654P 73.67
+1918%

EPYC 9654P outperforms Opteron 6274 by 1918% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Opteron 6274 5643
EPYC 9654P 113949
+1919%

EPYC 9654P outperforms Opteron 6274 by 1919% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.65 73.67
Recency 14 November 2011 10 November 2022
Physical cores 16 96
Threads 16 192
Cost $909 $10625
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654P is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 6274 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6274 and EPYC 9654P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6274
Opteron 6274
AMD EPYC 9654P
EPYC 9654P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Opteron 6274 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 9654P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6274 or EPYC 9654P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.