Xeon Platinum 9282 vs Opteron 4340
Primary details
Comparing Opteron 4340 and Xeon Platinum 9282 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon Platinum |
| Architecture codename | Seoul (2012) | Cascade Lake-AP (2019) |
| Release date | 4 December 2012 (11 years ago) | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Opteron 4340 and Xeon Platinum 9282 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 56 (Hexapentaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 112 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 26 |
| L1 cache | 288 KB | 3.5 MB |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB | 56 MB |
| L3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | 77 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 8,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 4340 and Xeon Platinum 9282 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 8 |
| Socket | C32 | Intel BGA5903 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 400 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 4340 and Xeon Platinum 9282. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| SIPP | - | + |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Opteron 4340 and Xeon Platinum 9282 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 4340 and Xeon Platinum 9282 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 4340 and Xeon Platinum 9282. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-2933 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 12 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 281.6 GB/s |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 December 2012 | 2 April 2019 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 56 |
| Threads | 6 | 112 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 400 Watt |
Opteron 4340 has 321.1% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 9282, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 833.3% more physical cores and 1766.7% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Opteron 4340 and Xeon Platinum 9282. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 4340 and Xeon Platinum 9282, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
