Ryzen 5 7640U vs Opteron 3380

VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 3380
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
2.70
Ryzen 5 7640U
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
13.91
+415%

Ryzen 5 7640U outperforms Opteron 3380 by a whopping 415% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 3380 and Ryzen 5 7640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1712551
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency3.7984.56
Architecture codenameDelhi (2012−2013)Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date4 December 2012 (11 years ago)3 May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Opteron 3380 and Ryzen 5 7640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache384 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size315 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 3380 and Ryzen 5 7640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FP8
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 3380 and Ryzen 5 7640U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataRyzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 3380 and Ryzen 5 7640U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 3380 and Ryzen 5 7640U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 760M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 3380 and Ryzen 5 7640U.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 3380 2.70
Ryzen 5 7640U 13.91
+415%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron 3380 4134
Ryzen 5 7640U 21284
+415%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.70 13.91
Recency 4 December 2012 3 May 2023
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 8 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Opteron 3380 has 33.3% more physical cores.

Ryzen 5 7640U, on the other hand, has a 415.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 50% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 7640U is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 3380 in performance tests.

Be aware that Opteron 3380 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 7640U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 3380 and Ryzen 5 7640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron  3380
Opteron 3380
AMD Ryzen 5 7640U
Ryzen 5 7640U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 5 votes

Rate Opteron 3380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 37 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7640U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 3380 or Ryzen 5 7640U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.