Ryzen 9 3950X vs Opteron 146

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 146
2003
1 core / 1 thread, 89 Watt
0.22
Ryzen 9 3950X
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 105 Watt
24.39
+10986%

Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms Opteron 146 by a whopping 10986% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 146 and Ryzen 9 3950X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3190206
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data18.03
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiency0.2321.98
Architecture codenameSledgeHammer (2003−2005)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release dateSeptember 2003 (21 year ago)14 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$60$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Opteron 146 and Ryzen 9 3950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads132
Base clock speedno data3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache128 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB64 MB
Chip lithography130 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size193 mm22 x 72 mm + 125 mm (IO-Die) mm2
Number of transistors106 million19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 146 and Ryzen 9 3950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket940AM4
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 146 and Ryzen 9 3950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 146 and Ryzen 9 3950X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 146 and Ryzen 9 3950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 146 0.22
Ryzen 9 3950X 24.39
+10986%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron 146 346
Ryzen 9 3950X 38735
+11095%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.22 24.39
Physical cores 1 16
Threads 1 32
Chip lithography 130 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 105 Watt

Opteron 146 has 18% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 3950X, on the other hand, has a 10986.4% higher aggregate performance score, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 3950X is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 146 in performance tests.

Be aware that Opteron 146 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 3950X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 146 and Ryzen 9 3950X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 146
Opteron 146
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Ryzen 9 3950X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Opteron 146 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 713 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 146 or Ryzen 9 3950X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.