Pentium 4 HT 3.00 vs Opteron 146

VS

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 146 and Pentium 4 HT 3.00 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameSledgeHammer (2003−2005)Northwood (2002−2004)
Release dateSeptember 2003 (21 year ago)April 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$60no data

Detailed specifications

Opteron 146 and Pentium 4 HT 3.00 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed2 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache128 KB8 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography130 nm130 nm
Die size193 mm2131 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors106 million55 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 146 and Pentium 4 HT 3.00 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket940478
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt82 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 146 and Pentium 4 HT 3.00. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2

Pros & cons summary


Threads 1 2
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 82 Watt

Pentium 4 HT 3.00 has 100% more threads, and 8.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Opteron 146 and Pentium 4 HT 3.00. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Opteron 146 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium 4 HT 3.00 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 146 and Pentium 4 HT 3.00, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 146
Opteron 146
Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.00
Pentium 4 HT 3.00

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Opteron 146 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 49 votes

Rate Pentium 4 HT 3.00 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 146 or Pentium 4 HT 3.00, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.