Athlon 750 vs Opteron 144
Primary details
Comparing Opteron 144 and Athlon 750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) | Thunderbird (1999−2000) |
| Release date | June 2003 (21 year ago) | 29 November 1999 (24 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $65 | $799 |
Detailed specifications
Opteron 144 and Athlon 750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 0.75 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | 102 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | 106 million | 22 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 144 and Athlon 750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 940 | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 35 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 144 and Athlon 750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 35 Watt |
Opteron 144 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon 750, on the other hand, has 142.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Opteron 144 and Athlon 750. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Opteron 144 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 750 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 144 and Athlon 750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
