i9-10900KF vs Athlon XP-M 2000+

Primary details

Comparing Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Core i9-10900KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated510
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data14.14
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Athlon XP-Mno data
Power efficiencyno data10.73
Architecture codenameBarton (2001−2004)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date17 June 2003 (21 year ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134$509

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Core i9-10900KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads120
Base clock speedno data3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.53 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate266 MT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier11.5no data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm14 nm
Die size101 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors54 Millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Core i9-10900KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAFCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Core i9-10900KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+

Security technologies

Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Core i9-10900KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Core i9-10900KF are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Core i9-10900KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2933
Maximum memory size4 GB128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data45.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Core i9-10900KF.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 June 2003 30 April 2020
Physical cores 1 10
Threads 1 20
Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 125 Watt

Athlon XP-M 2000+ has 400% lower power consumption.

i9-10900KF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, 900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Core i9-10900KF. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Athlon XP-M 2000+ is a notebook processor while Core i9-10900KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Core i9-10900KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon XP-M 2000+
Athlon XP-M 2000+
Intel Core i9-10900KF
Core i9-10900KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Athlon XP-M 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 317 votes

Rate Core i9-10900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon XP-M 2000+ or Core i9-10900KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.