Ultra 7 265KF vs Opteron 142

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 142
2003
1 core / 1 thread, 85 Watt
0.27
Core Ultra 7 265KF
2024
20 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
36.73
+13504%

Core Ultra 7 265KF outperforms Opteron 142 by a whopping 13504% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 142 and Core Ultra 7 265KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking318794
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data98.22
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.3027.97
Architecture codenameSledgeHammer (2003−2005)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release dateSeptember 2003 (21 year ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Opteron 142 and Core Ultra 7 265KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Efficient-coresno data12
Threads120
Base clock speedno data3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm3 nm
Die size193 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors106 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 142 and Core Ultra 7 265KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket940FCLGA1851
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 142 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Opteron 142 and Core Ultra 7 265KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 142 and Core Ultra 7 265KF are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 142 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-6400
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 142 and Core Ultra 7 265KF.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Opteron 142 0.27
Ultra 7 265KF 36.73
+13504%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron 142 428
Ultra 7 265KF 58839
+13647%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 36.73
Physical cores 1 20
Threads 1 20
Chip lithography 130 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 125 Watt

Opteron 142 has 47.1% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265KF, on the other hand, has a 13503.7% higher aggregate performance score, 1900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 4233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 265KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 142 in performance tests.

Be aware that Opteron 142 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265KF is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 142
Opteron 142
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Core Ultra 7 265KF

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 6 votes

Rate Opteron 142 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 63 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Opteron 142 and Core Ultra 7 265KF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.