Ultra 7 268V vs N200
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 7 268V outperforms N200 by a whopping 367% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing N200 and Core Ultra 7 268V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1588 | 456 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 50.91 | 83.89 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Lunar Lake (2024) |
| Release date | 1 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 24 September 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
N200 and Core Ultra 7 268V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 37 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 192 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 2.5 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on N200 and Core Ultra 7 268V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | Intel BGA 2833 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by N200 and Core Ultra 7 268V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| TSX | - | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| GPIO | + | no data |
Security technologies
N200 and Core Ultra 7 268V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by N200 and Core Ultra 7 268V are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by N200 and Core Ultra 7 268V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics | Arc 140V |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | 750 MHz | no data |
| Execution Units | 32 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of N200 and Core Ultra 7 268V integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by N200 and Core Ultra 7 268V integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | + | no data |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096 x 2160@60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096 x 2160@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by N200 and Core Ultra 7 268V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by N200 and Core Ultra 7 268V.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | 4 |
| USB revision | 2.0/3.2 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.35 | 15.64 |
| Recency | 1 January 2023 | 24 September 2024 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 17 Watt |
N200 has 183.3% lower power consumption.
Ultra 7 268V, on the other hand, has a 366.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more threads.
The Core Ultra 7 268V is our recommended choice as it beats the N200 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between N200 and Core Ultra 7 268V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
