i9-10900F vs Mobile Sempron SI-42

VS

Aggregate performance score

Mobile Sempron SI-42
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.21
Core i9-10900F
2020
10 cores / 20 threads, 65 Watt
12.51
+5857%

Core i9-10900F outperforms Mobile Sempron SI-42 by a whopping 5857% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Sempron SI-42 and Core i9-10900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3221624
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Mobile Sempronno data
Power efficiency0.8018.23
Architecture codenameSable (2008−2009)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Sempron SI-42 and Core i9-10900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads120
Base clock speedno data2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate1800 MHz8 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256K (per core)
L3 cacheno data20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Sempron SI-42 and Core i9-10900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1g2FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron SI-42 and Core i9-10900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+

Security technologies

Mobile Sempron SI-42 and Core i9-10900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Sempron SI-42 and Core i9-10900F are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron SI-42 and Core i9-10900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data45.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Sempron SI-42 and Core i9-10900F.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 12.51
Recency 1 September 2009 30 April 2020
Physical cores 1 10
Threads 1 20
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 65 Watt

Mobile Sempron SI-42 has 160% lower power consumption.

i9-10900F, on the other hand, has a 5857.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i9-10900F is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron SI-42 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobile Sempron SI-42 is a notebook processor while Core i9-10900F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron SI-42 and Core i9-10900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Sempron SI-42
Mobile Sempron SI-42
Intel Core i9-10900F
Core i9-10900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 14 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron SI-42 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 340 votes

Rate Core i9-10900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Sempron SI-42 or Core i9-10900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.