Celeron N6211 vs Mobile Sempron SI-42
Primary details
Comparing Mobile Sempron SI-42 and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2193 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 3.33 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Mobile Sempron | Elkhart Lake |
| Power efficiency | no data | 20.62 |
| Architecture codename | Sable (2008−2009) | Elkhart Lake (2022) |
| Release date | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) | 17 July 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $54 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Mobile Sempron SI-42 and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1.5 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 70 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Sempron SI-42 and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1g2 | BGA1493 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 6.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron SI-42 and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125 | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron SI-42 and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 September 2009 | 17 July 2022 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 6 Watt |
Celeron N6211 has an age advantage of 12 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Mobile Sempron SI-42 and Celeron N6211. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Mobile Sempron SI-42 is a notebook processor while Celeron N6211 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron SI-42 and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
