Athlon X2 L310 vs Mobile Sempron SI-40

VS

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Athlon X2 L310 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Mobile Sempron2x AMD Athlon
Architecture codenameSable (2008−2009)Conesus (2009)
Release date4 July 2008 (16 years ago)10 September 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Athlon X2 L310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rate1800 MHz800 MHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Athlon X2 L310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1g2BGA / 638 lidless micro-PGA
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Athlon X2 L310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125VMMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Virtualization, Enhanced Virus Protection
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Athlon X2 L310 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Mobile Sempron SI-40 772
Athlon X2 L310 866
+12.2%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 July 2008 10 September 2009
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 13 Watt

Athlon X2 L310 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Athlon X2 L310. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Athlon X2 L310, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Sempron SI-40
Mobile Sempron SI-40
AMD Athlon X2 L310
Athlon X2 L310

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 35 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron SI-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 7 votes

Rate Athlon X2 L310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Sempron SI-40 or Athlon X2 L310, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.