GX-210JA vs Mobile Sempron M100

VS

Aggregate performance score

Mobile Sempron M100
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.22
+37.5%
GX-210JA
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.16

Mobile Sempron M100 outperforms GX-210JA by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Sempron M100 and GX-210JA processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32013305
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Mobile SempronAMD
Power efficiency0.832.52
Architecture codenameCaspian (2009)Temash (2013)
Release date10 September 2009 (15 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Sempron M100 and GX-210JA basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed2 GHz1 GHz
Bus rate3200 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
Chip lithography40 nm28 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Sempron M100 and GX-210JA compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketSFT3 BGA
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron M100 and GX-210JA. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsAMD Virtualization, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, 3DNow, Enhanced Virus Protection, MMX86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
VirusProtect+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron M100 and GX-210JA. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.22 0.16
Recency 10 September 2009 23 May 2013
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 6 Watt

Mobile Sempron M100 has a 37.5% higher aggregate performance score.

GX-210JA, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

The Mobile Sempron M100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GX-210JA in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron M100 and GX-210JA, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Sempron M100
Mobile Sempron M100
AMD GX-210JA
GX-210JA

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 8 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron M100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate GX-210JA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Sempron M100 or GX-210JA, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.