Ryzen 5 7520C vs Mobile Sempron 3800+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Sempron 3800+ and Ryzen 5 7520C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3205not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesMobile SempronAMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Power efficiency0.64no data
Architecture codenameSherman (2009)Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)23 May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Sempron 3800+ and Ryzen 5 7520C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speedno data2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data100 mm2
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Sempron 3800+ and Ryzen 5 7520C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFT6
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron 3800+ and Ryzen 5 7520C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Sempron 3800+ and Ryzen 5 7520C are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron 3800+ and Ryzen 5 7520C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Sempron 3800+ and Ryzen 5 7520C.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 65 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 7520C has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 983.3% more advanced lithography process, and 106.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Sempron 3800+ and Ryzen 5 7520C. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron 3800+ and Ryzen 5 7520C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Sempron 3800+
Mobile Sempron 3800+
AMD Ryzen 5 7520C
Ryzen 5 7520C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Mobile Sempron 3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 46 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7520C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Sempron 3800+ or Ryzen 5 7520C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.