EPYC 9645 vs Mobile Sempron 3600+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Sempron 3600+ and EPYC 9645 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesMobile Sempronno data
Architecture codenameSherman (2009)Turin (2024)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,048

Detailed specifications

Mobile Sempron 3600+ and EPYC 9645 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)96
Threads1192
Base clock speedno data2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm3 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Sempron 3600+ and EPYC 9645 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno dataSP5
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron 3600+ and EPYC 9645. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Sempron 3600+ and EPYC 9645 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron 3600+ and EPYC 9645. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Sempron 3600+ and EPYC 9645.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 96
Threads 1 192
Chip lithography 65 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 320 Watt

Mobile Sempron 3600+ has 1180% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9645, on the other hand, has 9500% more physical cores and 19100% more threads, and a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Sempron 3600+ and EPYC 9645. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobile Sempron 3600+ is a notebook processor while EPYC 9645 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron 3600+ and EPYC 9645, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Sempron 3600+
Mobile Sempron 3600+
AMD EPYC 9645
EPYC 9645

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 12 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Sempron 3600+ or EPYC 9645, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.