Pentium III 1400 vs Mobile Sempron 3500+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Sempron 3500+ and Pentium III 1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesMobile Sempronno data
Architecture codenameKeeneTualatin (2000−2002)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)December 2001 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Sempron 3500+ and Pentium III 1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data8 KB
L2 cacheno data256 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data80 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data69 °C
Number of transistorsno data44 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Sempron 3500+ and Pentium III 1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data370
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt31 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Sempron 3500+ 259
+34.2%
Pentium III 1400 193

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 31 Watt

Mobile Sempron 3500+ has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 24% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Sempron 3500+ and Pentium III 1400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobile Sempron 3500+ is a notebook processor while Pentium III 1400 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron 3500+ and Pentium III 1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Sempron 3500+
Mobile Sempron 3500+
Intel Pentium III 1400
Pentium III 1400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 7 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron 3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 27 votes

Rate Pentium III 1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Sempron 3500+ or Pentium III 1400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.