Xeon 6780E vs Mobile Sempron 3300+
Primary details
Comparing Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Xeon 6780E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3242 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Mobile Sempron | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.29 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Roma (2005) | Sierra Forest (2024) |
| Release date | 1 June 2005 (19 years ago) | 3 June 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $11,350 |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Xeon 6780E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 144 |
| Threads | 1 | 144 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 128 KB | 4 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | no data | 108 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 85 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Xeon 6780E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | 745 | 4710 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62/25 Watt | 330 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Xeon 6780E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 (Roma Core), Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Xeon 6780E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Xeon 6780E are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Xeon 6780E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Xeon 6780E.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 88 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 June 2005 | 3 June 2024 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 144 |
| Threads | 1 | 144 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 330 Watt |
Mobile Sempron 3300+ has 432.3% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6780E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 19 years, 14300% more physical cores and 14300% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Xeon 6780E. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Mobile Sempron 3300+ is a notebook processor while Xeon 6780E is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Xeon 6780E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
