Celeron M 723 vs Mobile Pentium 4 532

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Pentium 4 532 and Celeron M 723 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesMobile Pentium 4Intel Celeron M
Architecture codenamePrescott (2001−2005)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release dateno data1 September 2008 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Pentium 4 532 and Celeron M 723 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed3.06 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus support533 MHz800 MHz
L2 cacheno data1 MB
Chip lithography90 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data410 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Pentium 4 532 and Celeron M 723 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataBGA956
Power consumption (TDP)88 Watt5 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Mobile Pentium 4 532 891
+60.5%
Celeron M 723 555

Mobile Pentium 4 532 outperforms Celeron M 723 by 61% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 88 Watt 5 Watt

Celeron M 723 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1660% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Pentium 4 532 and Celeron M 723. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Pentium 4 532 and Celeron M 723, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Mobile Pentium 4 532
Mobile Pentium 4 532
Intel Celeron M 723
Celeron M 723

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Mobile Pentium 4 532 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 14 votes

Rate Celeron M 723 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Pentium 4 532 or Celeron M 723, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.