Celeron M 723 vs Mobile Pentium 4 532
Aggregate performance score
Mobile Pentium 4 532 outperforms Celeron M 723 by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Mobile Pentium 4 532 and Celeron M 723 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3251 | 3341 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Mobile Pentium 4 | Intel Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 0.25 | 3.24 |
| Architecture codename | Prescott (2001−2005) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | no data | 1 September 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Pentium 4 532 and Celeron M 723 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 3.06 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Pentium 4 532 and Celeron M 723 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | BGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 88 Watt | 5 Watt |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.23 | 0.17 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 88 Watt | 5 Watt |
Mobile Pentium 4 532 has a 35.3% higher aggregate performance score.
Celeron M 723, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1660% lower power consumption.
The Mobile Pentium 4 532 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 723 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
