Athlon 64 3400+ vs Mobile Athlon 64 3400+

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Athlon 64 3400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesMobile Athlon 64no data
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Release dateAugust 2005 (19 years ago)January 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Athlon 64 3400+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128K128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512K
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithographyno data130 nm
Die size193 mm2193 mm2
Number of transistors106 million105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Athlon 64 3400+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754754
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt89 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Athlon 64 3400+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ 333
+5%
Athlon 64 3400+ 317

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 89 Watt

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ has 43.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Athlon 64 3400+. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 3400+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Athlon 64 3400+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
AMD Athlon 64 3400+
Athlon 64 3400+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 20 votes

Rate Athlon 64 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ or Athlon 64 3400+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.