Xeon W-3345 vs Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon W-3345 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesMobile Athlon 64no data
Power efficiencyno data10.89
Architecture codenameNewark (2003)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release dateAugust 2003 (21 year ago)29 July 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon W-3345 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads148
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz8 GT/s
L1 cache128K64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data36 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyno data10 nm
Die size193 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors106 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon W-3345 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket754FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon W-3345. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon W-3345 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon W-3345 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon W-3345. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon W-3345.

PCIe versionno data4
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ 326
Xeon W-3345 45694
+13917%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 24
Threads 1 48
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 250 Watt

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ has 303.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3345, on the other hand, has 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon W-3345. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is a notebook processor while Xeon W-3345 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon W-3345, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Intel Xeon W-3345
Xeon W-3345

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon W-3345 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ or Xeon W-3345, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.