Xeon Platinum 8571N vs Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon Platinum 8571N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated52
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.43
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesMobile Athlon 64no data
Power efficiencyno data13.57
Architecture codenameNewark (2003)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release dateAugust 2003 (21 year ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,839

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon Platinum 8571N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)52
Threads1104
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128K80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data300 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyno dataIntel 7 nm
Die size193 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
Number of transistors106 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon Platinum 8571N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon Platinum 8571N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon Platinum 8571N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon Platinum 8571N are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon Platinum 8571N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC)
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon Platinum 8571N.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ 326
Xeon Platinum 8571N 68385
+20877%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 52
Threads 1 104
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 300 Watt

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ has 383.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8571N, on the other hand, has 5100% more physical cores and 10300% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon Platinum 8571N. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8571N is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Xeon Platinum 8571N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Intel Xeon Platinum 8571N
Xeon Platinum 8571N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Platinum 8571N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ or Xeon Platinum 8571N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.