Ryzen 5 3500U vs Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 3500U outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ by a whopping 2045% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Ryzen 5 3500U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3287 | 1408 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 42 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Mobile Athlon 64 | AMD Ryzen 5 |
| Power efficiency | 0.31 | 27.24 |
| Architecture codename | Newark (2003) | Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) |
| Release date | August 2003 (21 year ago) | 6 January 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Ryzen 5 3500U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | PCIe 3.0 |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 21 |
| L1 cache | 128K | 128K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | no data | 12 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | 209.78 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 106 million | 4940 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Ryzen 5 3500U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | 754 | FP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Ryzen 5 3500U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Ryzen 5 3500U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Ryzen 5 3500U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Ryzen 5 3500U.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 12 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.20 | 4.29 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 5 3500U has a 2045% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and 313.3% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 5 3500U is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
