Apple M1 Max vs Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Primary details
Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 526 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Mobile Athlon 64 | Apple M-Series |
| Architecture codename | Newark (2003) | no data |
| Release date | August 2003 (21 year ago) | 18 October 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 10 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.06 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.22 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128K | 2.9 MB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 28 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 48 MB |
| Chip lithography | no data | 5 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 106 million | 57000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 754 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 2060 ‑ 3220 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Apple M1 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 10 |
| Threads | 1 | 10 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 2060 Watt |
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ has 3222.6% lower power consumption.
Apple M1 Max, on the other hand, has 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Apple M1 Max. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
