Ultra 9 185H vs Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

VS

Aggregate performance score

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
2003
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.28
Core Ultra 9 185H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 45 Watt
18.51
+6511%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ by a whopping 6511% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 185H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3131324
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesMobile Athlon 64Intel Meteor Lake-H
Power efficiency0.7638.90
Architecture codenameOakville (2003−2004)Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Release dateAugust 2003 (21 year ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$640

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 185H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads122
Base clock speedno data3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128K112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data24 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyno data7 nm
Die size193 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data110 °C
Number of transistors106 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 185H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754Intel BGA 2049
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 185H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 185H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 185H are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 185H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2350 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 185H.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ 0.28
Ultra 9 185H 18.51
+6511%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ 450
Ultra 9 185H 29403
+6434%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.28 18.51
Physical cores 1 16
Threads 1 22
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ has 28.6% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 185H, on the other hand, has a 6510.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 1500% more physical cores and 2100% more threads.

The Core Ultra 9 185H is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 185H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Core Ultra 9 185H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 425 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 185H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ or Core Ultra 9 185H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.