Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U vs Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

Aggregate performance score

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.25
Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 28 Watt
11.34
+4436%

Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ by a whopping 4436% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3151688
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesMobile Athlon 64no data
Power efficiency0.6838.33
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Hawk Point (2024)
Release dateAugust 2005 (19 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads112
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128K64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyno data4 nm
Die size193 mm2137 mm2
Number of transistors106 million20,900 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754FP7
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data14

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ 0.25
Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U 11.34
+4436%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ 398
Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U 18013
+4426%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 11.34
Physical cores 1 6
Threads 1 12
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U has a 4436% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and 25% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U
Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ or Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.