A6-9220C vs Mobile A A110
Primary details
Comparing Mobile A A110 and A6-9220C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2734 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Mobile A | AMD Bristol Ridge |
| Power efficiency | no data | 10.49 |
| Architecture codename | Stealey (2007) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 4 June 2007 (17 years ago) | 6 January 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Mobile A A110 and A6-9220C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.8 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 18 |
| L1 cache | no data | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | no data | 124.5 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile A A110 and A6-9220C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | 663-ball micro-FCBGA | FT4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile A A110 and A6-9220C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Virtualization, |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile A A110 and A6-9220C are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile A A110 and A6-9220C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 14.936 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile A A110 and A6-9220C.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 June 2007 | 6 January 2019 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 6 Watt |
Mobile A A110 has 100% lower power consumption.
A6-9220C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Mobile A A110 and A6-9220C. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile A A110 and A6-9220C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
