Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 vs Microsoft SQ1
Primary details
Comparing Microsoft SQ1 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1489 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Qualcomm Snapdragon | Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
| Architecture codename | Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) | Strix Point-HX PRO (Zen 5/5c) (2025) |
| Release date | 2 October 2019 (5 years ago) | January 2025 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
Microsoft SQ1 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 54 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Microsoft SQ1 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Microsoft SQ1 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX+, SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Microsoft SQ1 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Microsoft SQ1 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Qualcomm Adreno 685 | AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Microsoft SQ1 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 8 | 12 |
| Threads | 8 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm |
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 has 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Microsoft SQ1 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Microsoft SQ1 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
