Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs K6-2E+/400ICR
Primary details
Comparing K6-2E+/400ICR and Ryzen 7 9800X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 202 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 44.75 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD K6-2+ | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 19.96 |
| Architecture codename | K6-III (1999−2000) | Granite Ridge (2024) |
| Release date | no data | 7 November 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $479 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
K6-2E+/400ICR and Ryzen 7 9800X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 4.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.4 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Bus type | FSB | no data |
| Bus rate | 100 MT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 4.0 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 128 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 96 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 0.18 µm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 70.6 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 8,315 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on K6-2E+/400ICR and Ryzen 7 9800X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 16.5 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by K6-2E+/400ICR and Ryzen 7 9800X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by K6-2E+/400ICR and Ryzen 7 9800X3D are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by K6-2E+/400ICR and Ryzen 7 9800X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by K6-2E+/400ICR and Ryzen 7 9800X3D.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 24 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 16 Watt | 120 Watt |
K6-2E+/400ICR has 650% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 9800X3D, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.
We couldn't decide between K6-2E+/400ICR and Ryzen 7 9800X3D. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that K6-2E+/400ICR is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 9800X3D is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between K6-2E+/400ICR and Ryzen 7 9800X3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
