Xeon w9-3575X vs K6-2/400AFR

Primary details

Comparing K6-2/400AFR and Xeon w9-3575X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated30
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data33.96
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD K6-2no data
Power efficiencyno data14.48
Architecture codenameK6-2 (1998−1999)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date28 May 1998 (26 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,789

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

K6-2/400AFR and Xeon w9-3575X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)44
Threads188
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate99.99 MT/sno data
Multiplier4no data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data97.5 MB
Chip lithography0.25 µmIntel 7 nm
Die size81 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
Number of transistors9 Millionno data
64 bit support-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on K6-2/400AFR and Xeon w9-3575X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)no data340 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by K6-2/400AFR and Xeon w9-3575X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

K6-2/400AFR and Xeon w9-3575X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by K6-2/400AFR and Xeon w9-3575X are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by K6-2/400AFR and Xeon w9-3575X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 GB4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by K6-2/400AFR and Xeon w9-3575X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 May 1998 24 August 2024
Physical cores 1 44
Threads 1 88

Xeon w9-3575X has an age advantage of 26 years, and 4300% more physical cores and 8700% more threads.

We couldn't decide between K6-2/400AFR and Xeon w9-3575X. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that K6-2/400AFR is a desktop processor while Xeon w9-3575X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between K6-2/400AFR and Xeon w9-3575X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD K6-2/400AFR
K6-2/400AFR
Intel Xeon w9-3575X
Xeon w9-3575X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate K6-2/400AFR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w9-3575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about K6-2/400AFR or Xeon w9-3575X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.