Celeron N5095 vs Itanium 9760

VS

Primary details

Comparing Itanium 9760 and Celeron N5095 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1731
Place by popularitynot in top-10030
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Jasper Lake
Power efficiencyno data16.21
Architecture codenameno dataJasper Lake (2021)
Release date1 April 2017 (7 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Itanium 9760 and Celeron N5095 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speedno data2.9 GHz
Bus rate6.4 GT/sno data
L2 cacheno data1.5 MB
L3 cache32 MB4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature95 °C105 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Itanium 9760 and Celeron N5095 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA1248FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Itanium 9760 and Celeron N5095. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Itanium 9760 and Celeron N5095 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB+no data
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Itanium 9760 and Celeron N5095 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-i+no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Itanium 9760 and Celeron N5095. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Itanium 9760 and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Itanium 9760 and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Itanium 9760 and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Itanium 9760 and Celeron N5095.

PCI Express lanesno data8
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2017 11 January 2021
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 15 Watt

Itanium 9760 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron N5095, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 1033.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Itanium 9760 and Celeron N5095. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Itanium 9760 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N5095 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Itanium 9760 and Celeron N5095, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Itanium 9760
Itanium 9760
Intel Celeron N5095
Celeron N5095

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 6 votes

Rate Itanium 9760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1443 votes

Rate Celeron N5095 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Itanium 9760 or Celeron N5095, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.