Xeon Platinum 8380HL vs Itanium 9540
Primary details
Comparing Itanium 9540 and Xeon Platinum 8380HL processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Architecture codename | no data | Cooper Lake-SP (2021) |
| Release date | 1 October 2012 (12 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Itanium 9540 and Xeon Platinum 8380HL basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 28 (Octacosa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 56 |
| Base clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 4.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 6.4 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 38.5 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Itanium 9540 and Xeon Platinum 8380HL compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 8 |
| Socket | LGA1248 | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 250 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Itanium 9540 and Xeon Platinum 8380HL. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Itanium 9540 and Xeon Platinum 8380HL technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Itanium 9540 and Xeon Platinum 8380HL are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| VT-i | + | no data |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Itanium 9540 and Xeon Platinum 8380HL. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 RDIMM |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4.5 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Itanium 9540 and Xeon Platinum 8380HL.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2012 | 6 April 2021 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 28 |
| Threads | 16 | 56 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 250 Watt |
Itanium 9540 has 47.1% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8380HL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Itanium 9540 and Xeon Platinum 8380HL. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Itanium 9540 and Xeon Platinum 8380HL, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
