Apple M1 Max vs Itanium 9350
Primary details
Comparing Itanium 9350 and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 527 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | no data | Apple M-Series |
Release date | 1 January 2010 (14 years ago) | 18 October 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Itanium 9350 and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 10 |
Base clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 2.06 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 3.22 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 2.9 MB |
L2 cache | no data | 28 MB |
L3 cache | 24 MB L3 Cache | 48 MB |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 5 nm |
Number of transistors | no data | 57000 Million |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Itanium 9350 and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | FCLGA1248 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 185 Watt | 2060 ‑ 3220 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Itanium 9350 and Apple M1 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
PAE | 50 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Itanium 9350 and Apple M1 Max technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Itanium 9350 and Apple M1 Max are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 January 2010 | 18 October 2021 |
Physical cores | 4 | 10 |
Threads | 8 | 10 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 185 Watt | 2060 Watt |
Itanium 9350 has 1013.5% lower power consumption.
Apple M1 Max, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 150% more physical cores and 25% more threads, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Itanium 9350 and Apple M1 Max. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Itanium 9350 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 Max is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Itanium 9350 and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.