3020e vs Itanium 9140M
Primary details
Comparing Itanium 9140M and 3020e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2121 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 24.19 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Dali (Zen) (2020) |
| Release date | 1 October 2007 (17 years ago) | 4 August 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Itanium 9140M and 3020e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | no data | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.66 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 18 MB L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 76 °C | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Itanium 9140M and 3020e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PPGA611 | FT5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 104 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Itanium 9140M and 3020e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| FSB parity | + | no data |
Security technologies
Itanium 9140M and 3020e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Itanium 9140M and 3020e are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Itanium 9140M and 3020e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2007 | 4 August 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 104 Watt | 6 Watt |
3020e has an age advantage of 12 years, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1633.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Itanium 9140M and 3020e. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Itanium 9140M is a server/workstation processor while 3020e is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Itanium 9140M and 3020e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
