Celeron G6900T vs Iris Graphics 48
Primary details
Comparing Iris Graphics 48 and Celeron G6900T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 1672 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Iris Graphics | no data |
| Architecture codename | Gen9 | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| Release date | no data | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Iris Graphics 48 and Celeron G6900T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | no data | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.3 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm | 10 nm |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Iris Graphics 48 and Celeron G6900T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Iris Graphics 48 and Celeron G6900T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
Iris Graphics 48 and Celeron G6900T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Iris Graphics 48 and Celeron G6900T are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Iris Graphics 48 and Celeron G6900T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 76.8 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Iris Graphics 48 and Celeron G6900T.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Celeron G6900T has a 40% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Iris Graphics 48 and Celeron G6900T. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Iris Graphics 48 is a notebook processor while Celeron G6900T is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Iris Graphics 48 and Celeron G6900T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
