EPYC 7H12 vs HD Graphics 620
Primary details
Comparing HD Graphics 620 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 48 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Server |
Series | Intel HD Graphics | AMD EPYC |
Power efficiency | no data | 14.82 |
Architecture codename | Gen9.5 | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
Release date | no data | 18 September 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
HD Graphics 620 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | no data | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
Threads | no data | 128 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.6 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 0.35 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
Multiplier | no data | 26 |
L1 cache | no data | 96K (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 512K (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 256 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
Die size | no data | 192 mm2 |
Number of transistors | no data | 4,800 million |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on HD Graphics 620 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
Socket | no data | TR4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by HD Graphics 620 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by HD Graphics 620 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by HD Graphics 620 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Eight-channel |
Maximum memory size | 65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB | 4 TiB |
Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.763 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
EPYC 7H12 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 620 and EPYC 7H12. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that HD Graphics 620 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between HD Graphics 620 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.