Xeon D-2896TER vs GX-210JA
Primary details
Comparing GX-210JA and Xeon D-2896TER processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3305 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.52 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Temash (2013) | no data |
| Release date | 23 May 2013 (11 years ago) | 1 October 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
GX-210JA and Xeon D-2896TER basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 40 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 30 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on GX-210JA and Xeon D-2896TER compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FT3 BGA | FCBGA2579 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 110 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by GX-210JA and Xeon D-2896TER. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
GX-210JA and Xeon D-2896TER technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by GX-210JA and Xeon D-2896TER are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by GX-210JA and Xeon D-2896TER. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by GX-210JA and Xeon D-2896TER.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 32 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 24 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 4 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 May 2013 | 1 October 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 20 |
| Threads | 2 | 40 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 110 Watt |
GX-210JA has 1733.3% lower power consumption.
Xeon D-2896TER, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and 900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads.
We couldn't decide between GX-210JA and Xeon D-2896TER. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GX-210JA is a notebook processor while Xeon D-2896TER is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between GX-210JA and Xeon D-2896TER, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
