Ryzen 7 7730U vs GX-210JA

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GX-210JA
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.16
Ryzen 7 7730U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
11.72
+7225%

Ryzen 7 7730U outperforms GX-210JA by a whopping 7225% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing GX-210JA and Ryzen 7 7730U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3292661
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMDno data
Power efficiency2.5273.94
Architecture codenameTemash (2013)Barcelo-U Refresh (2023)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

GX-210JA and Ryzen 7 7730U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data180 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on GX-210JA and Ryzen 7 7730U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3 BGAFP6
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by GX-210JA and Ryzen 7 7730U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by GX-210JA and Ryzen 7 7730U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by GX-210JA and Ryzen 7 7730U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by GX-210JA and Ryzen 7 7730U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GX-210JA 0.16
Ryzen 7 7730U 11.72
+7225%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

GX-210JA 248
Ryzen 7 7730U 18610
+7404%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 11.72
Recency 23 May 2013 4 January 2023
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 15 Watt

GX-210JA has 150% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 7730U, on the other hand, has a 7225% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 7730U is our recommended choice as it beats the GX-210JA in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between GX-210JA and Ryzen 7 7730U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD GX-210JA
GX-210JA
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U
Ryzen 7 7730U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate GX-210JA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1004 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7730U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about GX-210JA or Ryzen 7 7730U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.